LOUISE PENNY’S

Series Re-Read: A Fatal Grace

INTRODUCTION BY HOPE DELLON

I started working with Louise in October 2006, after the editor who had bought her first three books left Minotaur for another company. At the time, only Still Life had been published. A Fatal Grace was in bound galleys, and The Cruelest Month was a completed manuscript in search of a title.

Since I needed to read three books in a row, it was lucky that I loved them from the start. Although Louise had me from the acknowledgments at the beginning of Still Life, there came a scene in A Fatal Grace that gave me chills in a way that only the very best manuscripts ever have. (I describe that scene in the recap below.) I even remember where I was when I read it. In those days I had an hour-long commute on the train. I know that I started reading the galleys on the train on a Tuesday night, then continued on Wednesday morning, when we always have our editorial meetings. By the time I got to that meeting, I couldn’t stop talking about how amazing Louise was, except perhaps to ignore everyone else and keep reading more of the story.

When I’m asked what makes her books so great, I usually fall back on a quote from Emily Dickinson: “If I read a book [and] it makes my whole body so cold no fire ever can warm me I know that is poetry. If I feel physically as if the top of my head were taken off, I know that is poetry. These are the only ways I know it. Is there any other way?” That’s how I feel about Louise’s novels.

I believe I didn’t meet Louise and her husband, Michael, in person until Malice Domestic in Crystal City, VA, in the spring of 2008. By that time, Still Life had won many awards (including the Anthony, Arthur Ellis, Barry, Dilys, and New Blood Dagger) for Best First Novel, but not the Agatha; and we didn’t want to jinx anything by expecting her to win Best Novel for A Fatal Grace. I remember how thrilling it was when she did win—but what I had forgotten, until Louise mentioned it recently, was that the awards banquet happened to fall on my birthday. Now that she reminds me—and how remarkable for her to remember—I know that she and Michael insisted on taking me to lunch on that Saturday, and made more of a fuss about my birthday than they did about her chances of winning the Agatha. They were as warm and brilliant and funny as you might imagine from reading Louise’s books, and it’s been a joy to work with her ever since.

RECAP

Chapters 1-21: The first lines of A Fatal Grace foretell the death of the nastiest woman in Three Pines: “Had CC de Poitiers known she was going to be murdered she might have bought her husband, Richard, a Christmas gift….” The doomed CC has written a self-help book that prattles about love and enlightenment, even though she is actually like the Snow Queen from the fairytale who pierces everyone’s hearts with ice.

Meanwhile, in “the snow globe that was Three Pines,” CC’s 14-year-old daughter, Crie, has sewn her own chiffon snowflake costume for her school’s Christmas pageant, “to surprise Mommy.” She has been on a diet for a month and is sure her mother will notice soon. Except her mother doesn’t bother to show up.

Clara Morrow and her friend Myrna drive to Montreal, where Clara is dying to see the Christmas windows at Ogilvy’s department store that have enchanted her since childhood. She and her handsome husband, Peter, have been starving artists in Three Pines for years, although his precisely detailed paintings have finally started to sell. No one wants to buy Clara’s wilder depictions of warrior uteruses (!) and melting trees.

Hearing that CC knows important gallery owner Denis Fortin, Clara timidly asks if she would mind showing him her portfolio—which CC disdainfully throws in the trash. “Very annoying,” she says to her lover, photographer Saul Petrov. “Imagine asking me for a favor?” CC has much more important things to do: There’s a sale at Ogilvy’s and she wants to buy a special pair of boots made of baby sealskin with metal claws.

Clara’s joy at the Christmas windows is disrupted by a filthy pile of blankets that turns out to be a beggar throwing up. Disgusted, Clara hastens inside to the book launch for her neighbor, Ruth Zardo, the bitter but brilliant old poet whose friends from Three Pines turn up to support her.

On the escalators at Ogilvy’s, Clara passes CC, who says to the man beside her, “I’m so sorry, Denis, that you think Clara’s art is amateur and banal.” It’s a heart-stopping moment. Devastated, Clara shuffles out of the store and sees the stinking beggar she’d ignored on the way in. Impulsively, Clara gives a package of food she’s just bought to the bag lady, who grasps her wrist and says, “I have always loved your art, Clara.” Whoa. This was the moment when I started to feel as if the top of my head was being taken off.

A few days later it is Christmas Eve in Three Pines, with shortbread stars (Louise’s books always make me hungry) and carolers and a midnight service at St. Thomas’s church, where a child starts to sing with angelic purity. The singer is CC’s daughter, wearing a grotesque pink sundress but with bliss on her face. After the service, the whole village can hear CC berating Crie as a “stupid, stupid girl. You humiliated me. They were laughing at you, you know.” CC’s gutless father barely utters a protest.

When Saul turns up at the Bistro on Christmas, Myrna invites him to the community breakfast and curling match on the following day. It’s a perfect setting for the last job Saul intends to do for CC, who wants pictures of herself “frolicking among the natives at Christmas. If possible he had to get shots of the locals looking at CC with wonder and affection.” A pretty tall order.

Chief Inspector Armand Gamache of the Sûreté and his wife, Reine-Marie, make their first appearance in the book on the day after Christmas, when they have a tradition of reviewing unsolved cases. “If I was murdered,” says Gamache, “I’d like to think the case wouldn’t just sit unsolved. Someone would make an extra effort.” (I love this man.) Reine-Marie notices that one of the cases is new: There was a bag lady who had hung out at the bus station for years—but was strangled outside of Ogilvy’s department store on the day Clara saw her there. Astoundingly, a copy of Ruth’s new book, signed “You stink, love Ruth,” was found with the body.

Then the phone rings, and the duty officer for Three Pines tells Gamache there has been a murder. So much for a quiet Boxing Day. Within minutes Gamache and his second-in-command, Inspector Jean-Guy Beauvoir, are on their way to Three Pines, to investigate the very odd death of CC de Poitiers.

CC’s murder seems impossible: She was electrocuted at the curling match, in the middle of a frozen lake in front of dozens of witnesses. After Gamache gathers his team in the old railway station, Beauvoir recaps the only way CC’s murder could have worked: “A: she had to be standing in water; B: she had to have taken off her gloves; C: she had to touch something electrified; and D: she had to be wearing metal on the bottom of her boots.” Sure, nobody liked CC, but who hated her enough—and had the expertise—to pull off something like that?

Then a new team member arrives unexpectedly: Agent Yvette Nichol—”the rancid, wretched, petty little woman who’d almost ruined their last case”—apparently sent by the Superintendent of the Sûreté. Gamache is furious to see her, and knows that his enemies at Headquarters are still working against him.

With or without the unwelcome Nichol, the team has much to investigate: Where is Saul and what photos might he have taken of the curling match? Why does the coroner find excess niacin in CC’s body? Can it be possibly be coincidence that CC’s book, Be Calm, has the same name as the meditation center Bea Mayer, known as Mother, runs in Three Pines? After Gamache admires The Three Graces, Clara’s painting of Mother and the two other elderly women who are her best friends in Three Pines, she tells him about her poisonous encounter with CC at Ogilvy’s—and he quietly adds Clara’s name to the long list of suspects.

Chapter 22-End: Clues and questions and suspects continue to pile up for Gamache and his team. Having learned that CC de Poitiers, who claimed to be the daughter of Eleanor and Henri de Poitiers, invented both her name and her past (Eleanor de Poitiers, better known as Eleanor of Aquitaine, actually died in 1204), Gamache needs to find out who CC really was. Are there any significant clues to be found in the video cassette of The Lion in Winter that turned up in CC’s garbage after the murder?

Meanwhile, Gamache is astonished when Clara proudly shows him the Li Bien ornament Peter gave her for Christmas, which is exactly like the ball CC supposedly used as the basis for her garbled philosophy. The glass ball is painted with three pine trees, the word Noël, and a single capital letter, L. Was it the picture of the trees that prompted CC to buy the monstrous old Hadley house in Three Pines? Awkwardly, Peter is forced to confess that while he meant to buy Clara something for Christmas this year, he actually found the ball in the Williamsburg dump.

When Gamache meets Émilie Longpré—age 82, captain of the curling team, and one of Clara’s Three Graces—and her dog, Henri, on an early morning walk, she tells him about an encounter with CC at Mother’s meditation center, where CC arrogantly proclaimed that since she was calling her own book and company Be Calm, Mother would have to change the name of her center or perhaps close it altogether. After breakfast, the tiny Émilie gives Gamache & co. a curling lesson that convinces even Beauvoir, who has always scoffed at curling as a sport, that it’s a lot harder than it looks. And Gamache, who finally grasps what it meant when the 78-year-old Mother loudly “cleared the house” at the curling match, suddenly knows how the murderer got away with it.

The questions about CC’s mother keep circling back to the Three Graces. Do they know who the L of the Li Bien ball was, or could it possibly even be one of them? And what might 92-year-old Kaye Thompson, who was sitting next to CC at the match, have seen as she was murdered?

When Saul’s photos are developed, they somehow do not include any shots from the time of the murder. And as eager as Saul seems to be to start a new, better life in Three Pines, he still has one undeveloped roll of film that he hastily throws in the fireplace when Gamache and his team visit him at the chalet he has rented.

With the help of an idea from Clara about the discarded video, the case seems to be coming together, when a raging fire breaks out at Saul’s chalet, and the unlikely trio of Gamache, Beauvoir, and Agent Nichol try to rescue him. Émilie finally tells Gamache the heartbreaking truth about CC’s mother, and the Three Graces prepare to pay the price for what they have done. And then Gamache suddenly realizes there is one last horrible secret in CC’s family.

The book ends at New Year’s, with Reine-Marie’s first visit to Three Pines. Both of them know that the plots against Gamache are growing more sinister, but as they drive home:

In the rearview mirror Armand Gamache could see Three Pines. He got out of the car and stared down at the village, each home glowing with warm and beckoning light, promising protection against a world sometimes too cold. He closed his eyes and felt his racing heart calm.

“Are you all right?” Reine-Marie’s mittened hand slipped into his.

“I’m more than all right.” He smiled. “I have everything.”

FAVORITE QUOTE

Gamache says to Clara, “When someone stabs you it’s not your fault that you feel pain.”

Gamache: “I knew then I was in the company of people who loved not only books, but words. Spoken, written, the power of words.”

CONCLUSION

I am not sure how many times I’ve read A Fatal Grace, but I still find it as extraordinary as I did back in 2006. I think it’s magnificent on so many levels: as a complex and masterful detective story, as a glorious character study, and as an exploration of universal hopes and fears. I love that it can be hilarious one minute and heartbreaking the next.

I also love the way Louise focuses on the power of words, from the literal handwriting on more than one wall, to the hidden meanings of names like Mother, Elle, and Crie (what kind of parents would name a child that?), to the ways that words can kill or heal. I also marvel that someone like me, who is at least as much of a skeptic as Jean-Guy Beauvoir, can find myself wondering about such mysteries as lemon meringue pie.

DISCUSSION QUESTIONS

  1. If the village of Three Pines truly existed, would you want to live there? Why or why not? How does Christmas bring out the best or the worst in any of the villagers?
  1. Who is your favorite character in the book so far?
  1. In Louise’s books I am always stopping to admire wonderful images or jokes or observations (or descriptions of food!). Were there any lines that particularly struck you in Part I?
  1. What do you think of Ruth’s idea that “most people, while claiming to hate authority, actually yearned for someone to take charge”?
  1. Gamache tells Lemieux, “All the mistakes I’ve made have been because I’ve assumed something and then acted as though it was fact.” Have you ever made important assumptions that turned out not to be true?
  1. What interests you most about the two murder victims, CC and the bag lady known only as Elle, and the way Gamache conducts his investigation?
  1. There are so many clues hidden in plain sight in A Fatal Grace, I lost count at 6 or 7 (all of which I missed the first time through). Did you spot any of them, and did you solve any of the various puzzles before Gamache did?
  1. What do you make of Gamache’s relationships with the different members of his team, from Beauvoir to Nichol?
  1. How do you feel about The Three Graces?
  1. Near the end, Gamache says, “This whole case has been about belief and the power of the word.” I’ll say. What are the ways in which words have power?
  1. Speaking of belief, what do you make of the apparent brushes with God: the beggar who loved Clara’s art (which Em maintains she had never seen); Gamache finding God in a diner eating lemon meringue pie; Em’s road worker with the sign saying “Ice Ahead”; Billy Williams, etc.?
  1. Do you agree with Gamache in Chapter 33 that “when you’ve seen the worst you appreciate the best?”

A Fatal Grace, Part 2

Clues and questions and suspects continue to pile up for Gamache and his team. Having learned that CC de Poitiers, who claimed to be the daughter of Eleanor and Henri de Poitiers, invented both her name and her past (Eleanor de Poitiers, better known as Eleanor of Aquitaine, actually died in 1204), Gamache needs to find out who CC really was. Are there any significant clues to be found in the video cassette of The Lion in Winter that turned up in CC's garbage after the murder? Meanwhile, Gamache is astonished when Clara proudly shows him the Li Bien ornament Peter gave her for Christmas, which is exactly like the ball CC supposedly used as the basis for her garbled philosophy. The glass ball is painted with three pine trees, the word Noël, and a single capital letter, L. Was it the picture of the trees that prompted CC to buy the monstrous old Hadley house in Three Pines? Awkwardly, Peter is forced to confess that while he meant to buy Clara something for


READ FULL POST

A Fatal Grace, Part 1

I started working with Louise in October 2006, after the editor who had bought her first three books left Minotaur for another company. At the time, only Still Life had been published. A Fatal Grace was in bound galleys, and The Cruelest Month was a completed manuscript in search of a title. Since I needed to read three books in a row, it was lucky that I loved them from the start. Although Louise had me from the acknowledgments at the beginning of Still Life, there came a scene in A Fatal Grace that gave me chills in a way that only the very best manuscripts ever have. (I describe that scene in the recap below.) I even remember where I was when I read it. In those days I had an hour-long commute on the train. I know that I started reading the galleys on the train on a Tuesday night, then continued on Wednesday morning, when we always have our editorial meetings. By the time I got to that meeting, I couldn’t stop talking about how amazi


READ FULL POST

AuthorHOPE DELLON was an executive editor at both St. Martin’s Press and Minotaur Books. Hope edited Louise Penny from 2006 until her passing in 2020.

388 replies on “Series Re-Read: A Fatal Grace”

Going back … Yes to Q#1 because I’ve wanted to live in Three Pines since I read the first book. However, I’m retired, have anxiety attacks about travel anyway, and love winters. (This last one was the first time I remember ever getting tired of snow.) As for Q#2, Ruth bit me in the derriere in that first book, too, and I’ve turned pages rapidly to find her and her “take no prisoners” attitude. Is she nasty? Not so much in my eyes. She’s just old and doesn’t suffer fools … and has a lot of love stuffed inside.

Yes,I think I would very much like to live in Three Pines,but only during the summer months. Having grown up in Prince Edward Island,the winter snowstorms are not such a distant memory. The characters have formed a supportive community. Some ,long time citizens with histories. The focal point in this book is the wonderful restaurant,owned and operated by Gabri and Olivier,transplants from the city,Montreal. Olivier ,an antique collector,displays many of his treasures right there in the Bistro,price tags hanging from them. They also own the B& B. 2. My favourite character is ,was and always will be , Gamache. 4. I agree with Ruth.
5. One of my biggest, hugest flaws,has been making snap judgements. But,at 79 am working on that. 6. Very sorry for the poor ,lost Elle. CC ,also a lost soul, was capable of making choices,however was totally heartless.
On my second read of this book,it became more difficult to have much interest in the outcome.

To separate the characters from living in Three Pines seems sort of like breaking up a mobius strip. Three Pines without the characters would be, not the Three Pines we think about living in. The characters living elsewhere would be, not the characters we love. I would love to live where there was so much mutual respect, tolerance, love and support, humor and camraderie.
If I could be any character, I would chose to be the fireplace in the Bistro. The character I am most intrigued by is Clara. Is she the young Ruth? Is Ruth the old Peter? I worry about Clara. I worry about how she will reconcile her talent, her life, her needs with her love for Peter. As the antithetic couple to Gamache and Reine-Marie, I wonder if (spoiler alert!!) she will find happiness without Peter, and ultimately become the isolate still talented genius like Ruth. Of course a new male character could stumble upon and into town.
The character I most enjoy is Ruth. Her espirit du Ruth is as bracing as frostbite. Viva Ruth!
The character I wish was real is, of course, Gamache. Were he alive, I would have to rethink my position on human cloning.
The characters I wish lived next door would be, Olivier and Gabri or at least ran the closest restaurant to where I live now.
The character I wish was participating in this virtual book club, would be Myrna. What could she tell us about the characters?
Finally, what I love about these stories is the humor that pops up as the world of the characters is suddenly shaken not stirred. It is what humans do. We joke, we kid, we laugh uncontrollably and as unexpectedly as we sneeze. Because of this, the characters come to life; and more importantly, make us care about them as much as if they were real. I never felt like that about Hercule Poirot!

This may be my favorite observation yet: “The character I wish was real is, of course, Gamache. Were he alive, I would have to rethink my position on human cloning.” 🙂

Three Pines is such a magical place. Of course I would like to live there and be friends with all those nice people. Never mind that I can’t stand the cold; that’s beside the point, which is that I love Three Pines.

My favorite character has to be Clara. I feel for her so much. She has trouble believing in herself and her artistic ability, in large part because Peter is not very supportive. And that CC de Poitiers lady said horrible things about Clara’s art and it was only done because she knew Clara would hear her. It was done to hurt Clara. It saved Clara when the bag lady told her she had always loved her work, and called her by her name. No wonder she thought that God was speaking through the bag lady. There are so many moments like these in Louise’s books.

Food, ah the food: at Clara’s house, at the Bistro. These books got me to drinking cafe au laits because they all enjoyed them so much. I like cafe au lait but I also maybe prefer it a bit to have coffee with half ‘n’ half.

What Ruth said about people and authority is so true. You find this especially with teenagers who while they claim not to want to be told what to do and claim to not be children, etc. really are looking for guidance. They really do want their parents to be attentive to them, and to approve of them. If their parents do not approve, the best thing for them to do is sit down with their teen and discuss what is going on. Not just to yell at the teen and accuse her of acting like a child.

Making assumptions is a risky business. I try not to make them.

Gamache always looks at all sides of a case. He is careful not to overlook anything. The mystery of who was responsible for CC’s death is one that requires the kind of careful detective work that Gamache and his team are famous for.

The little restaurants that Gamache eats in seem so real.
A friend is going to Quibec and would love to go to have
Coffee in one, if anyone can share an address.
The mystery unfolds with surprising inventiveness lifelike
looping around my heart with such warmth. Yes, I do want to live there.

Ann – I’ve been to a café that Gamache visits in BURY YOUR DEAD: Chez Temporel, 25 Rue Couillard, Quebec City. Fantastic croissants and café au lait.

1. Yes I would want to live in Three Pines! But even as I say that I know I don’t know what I’m talking about because (writing from Singapore, on the equator) the idea of snow and cold is magic and Three Pines is for me what Ogilvy’s Christmas window is for Clara.
I think Christmas carries a lot of baggage for people. Like a birthday/anniversary we all share, and we remember all the delights and disappointments and see the selves we were in Christmases past.

2. Favourite character so far–Clara, because she was so hopeful giving CC the photographs, so hurt by that (horrible mean nasty) woman and then ‘God likes my work’ which I think is true, it just came via Elle and it wouldn’t have come if Clara had not stopped to give food to Elle. That’s all my favourite moment in the book up till now because I was wincing at the smell and the misery of homelessness and Clara’s disappointment and suddenly “I’ve always loved your art, Clara” comes.

3. I Love all Louise Penny’s food descriptions! But this time my favourite part is where Gamache tries to think comfort at Crie. He wants her to know things wouldn’t always be so bad. And in a way he is praying. I loved him doing that and I also loved Lemieux’s reaction, how to his generation praying was worse than rape, sodomy, failure… somehow by writing that Louise Penny disarms the reaction and makes Gamache’s message ‘the world could be a good place’ come through for everyone, not just poor Crie.

4. I think Ruth is right that “most people, while claiming to hate authority, actually yearned for someone to take charge”. Being in authority is very very difficult. I’ve seen it first hand (I’m older than this city-state I am a citizen of). But I think what makes things worse is that the people who Want to be in authority are often the worst people to have that power. Like CC viciously using her position of parental authority to put down–not her daughter (who I think was collateral damage here)–the villagers who so clearly loved Crie’s singing in the church. And Lyon has surrendered all authority over himself and his daughter to CC also, as Saul Petrov does for a while. And (sorry I’m afraid this may upset some people) Clara surrenders authority over her own work to Peter’s approval and (via CC’s deception) to Denis Fortin’s approval and finally (via Elle’s channel) to God’s approval. On the other hand Gamache is in authority because he is needed and because there is no one else who wants to do what he does–solve the murders of two unloved women.

5. I consciously make assumptions and deliberately act on them because I find getting hung up on what I can know for sure is more paralyzing. When in school trying to understand death/consciousness/wave-particle duality I got really knotted up (my poor parents sent me to church counselling which didn’t help and bought me the Encyclopaedia Brittanica, which did) I decided it was easier to decide to live as though this table is solid matter and God has photons as well as sparrows in his ken and to keep adjusting assumptions as more information comes in.

6. What interested me most in how Gamache took on the cases of the two dead unloved women was how Reine Marie influenced his decision. And I thought Reine Marie was the opposite of CC and Elle because she is more free and independent than Elle though living with husband among friends and more loved and respected and therefore more powerful/ influential than CC.

Thank you Hope and thank you everyone who commented–this is making me enjoy the books all over again and so much more!

True story: My husband and I were driving in Maine and listening to one of Louise’s audiobooks when we got stuck in a traffic jam for TWO HOURS. On the one hand, we were so caught up in the story that we almost didn’t mind the wait; on the other hand, her descriptions of delicious food made us so hungry that we would have given anything for the Bistro to appear before us. (Didn’t happen. Darn.)

1~ I would LOVE to live in Three Pines. It’s a close knit community. People have faults but are accepted. You would be supported if and when you had problems. Also I would love to give back to others.

2~ Favorite character? I love Gamach! Favorite of favorites! So wise, kind, gentle. However my heart cries out for Crie. I want to take her into my home and heart.

3~One that stands out is how the village is described as a snow globe. I’ve always wanted to enter a snow globe and visit!

4~Ruth can really see below the surface and grasp what’s in a person’s motives.

5~I can’t tell you how many times I’ve made that mistake! I’m slowly learning though!

6~Those two characters are such contrasts. CC looks on the inside how the bag lady looks on the outside. Dirty, ugh, stinky…The bag lady is pretty on the inside. Sweet, giving and kind.

One of my favourite quotes: Everything makes sense.Everything. We just don’t know how yet. No, Agent Lemieux, our job is to find the sense.

I like two characters: 1) Crie: the misunderstood, over weight, invisible child who has talent and smarts being smothered by every authority figure around her. 2) Clara: I have always liked this character, the artist never found but always trying. Of course, there are now 2 people, from outside Three Pines, that have seen her art….so we anticipate some changes.

I thought CC was the reincarnation of The White Witch, who kept Narnia forever Winter, yet never Christmas. If anyone could kill the spirit of Christmas, surely it would be CC de Poitiers.

1-a. Live in Three Pines? Of course!! I’m still trying to track down the location from references to the known villages. Failing that I’ll head to “Livres Lac Brome,” purveyors of all things Three Pines. Surely they will know the way. In the meantime I’ll read while I sip my café-au-lait from my “Vive Gamache/Three Pines” mug 🙂
http://bookmanager.com/1178946/?q=h.tviewer&e_def_id=XFL6ZYAMO8U

1-b: Christmas tends to bring out the best and worst of anyone [along with other festive occasions], depending on their past experiences, and the Villagers are no different in that regard. I’ll have to look again to see if Ruth heard the outrage from CC following the Christmas Eve service. Would it have been out of character for her to not react … or would it simply have confirmed her feelings about the worst of everyone?

2. Favourite people: Armand Gamache, of course, he is why we are all here, after all. My next in line favourites are Agent Isabelle Lacoste for her spiritual side, and Reine-Marie for her intelligence, warmth, compassion, and loyalty.

3. I enjoy all of the descriptive images that bring the area to life in my mind.

4. I agree with Ruth-most people wait for someone else to take charge and are glad that someone else has taken on the responsibility.

5. Assumptions: Several times in my life I have made serious assumptions about my working superiors … who turned out in the end to have feet of clay, just like me. As I am now sitting just to the lee of 70, I often make assumptions about my physical capabilities … only to find they have departed, somewhere along the way.

6. As others have written, the best thing about the investigations are that Gamache offers his best to those who are less than likeable, like El, or even worthy of distain, as in CC de Poitiers’ case. Also the insistence of Reine-Marie that he look into the case. The measure of a person is seen in how he/she treats those who can do nothing for him/her.

Brian, Loved your comparison of CC to the White Witch of Narnia! Made me chuckle, but what an appropriate analogy! – meg

I don’t think Ruth believes the worst of everyone, though she seems to want everyone to think the worst of her.

Terrific insight, Linda: “I don’t think Ruth believes the worst of everyone, though she seems to want everyone to think the worst of her.”

VICTIMS: CC & ELLE: I found a number of things interesting about the murders of these two women.
* 1. The murders coincidentally occurred so close together. Elle, the homeless woman, was strangled the day/night that the villagers attended Ruth’s book signing and Clara & Myrna went Christmas shopping. On Boxing Day (?day after Christmas?) – as Armand and Reine-Marie go through files of Metro Policeman Marc Brault’s unsolved cases, Reine-Marie discovers the new file on Elle – accidentally misplaced with the old ‘cold cases’ and R-M also recognizes the homeless woman from seeing her repeatedly near the bus station.
It’s while they’re in his Surete office that he receives the phone call from Officer Lemieux (wonder if he’s related to our local Penquin hockey hero!?) – that CC has been murdered & Gamache realizes he has to return to Three Pines.

*2.– Soooo – Gamache learns of the two women’s deaths within minutes/an hour! – One in the city – One in Three Pines.

*3. And we as readers know that this two victims are connected -even ephemerally – through Clara – even before our noble Inspector discovers the connection!
CC devastated Clara with her deliberately cruel & false comment that the art critic/gallery owner found Mrs. Morrow’s work to be banal – when CC never spoke to him, never showed him Clara’s portfolio and had dumped it in the trash can at the Ritz during her tryst with Saul! When Clara recovers and takes food & hot drink to the homeless lady, . . . “A mitten shot our, black with muck, and cupped itself round Clara’s wrist. The head lifted. Weary, runny eyes met Clara’s and held them for a long moment. ‘I have always loved your art, Clara.'” Questions: How does she know Clara’s name? Where has she seen Clara’s art to be able to tell her that she loves it?!!!!!

* 4. There are also commonalities between CC & Elle. A. Neither Isabelle Lacoste or the Metro police or Lemieux have been able to find any past info on either woman. No one knows if Cecelia de Poitiers or Elle are either woman’s real names. Officials are unable to find them in any registry. B. Both women are coated with ‘black muck’ – either literally (Elle) or figuratively in terms of her soul (CC). C. There seems to be some connection (yup! an assumption/prediction on my part that may or may not prove to be true as I read second half of book!) – there seems to be some connection between their names. When Isabella tries to get info on CC’s mother from the Surete in France, everyone she talks to laughs at her or thinks she’s trying to pull their legs. The names CC provided as her parents in her “Be Calm” book are those of Eleanor of Acquitaine and Henry II! = definitely not possible. BUT – Elle is an abbreviation or nickname for Eleanor as is Ellie, Nell, Nellie. Don’t know if this is of any value now or not, but look forward to seeing if my assumption/prediction has any merit.
*5. Again – some light/dark imagery: CC’s heart & soul seem to be filled with darkness & cruelty. Elle, who seems to have absolutely nothing & stuffs her clothes with newspapers to retain heat, provides the light of kindness to Clara when she needs it the most
6. A Question: What about the book that Ruth signed and gave to Elle – with inscription, “You stink! love – Ruth” Ruth doesn’t seem to be someone who throws the word “love” around easily at all. Why would she inscribe a book to Elle with that sentiment? – and why would Elle keep it tucked into her clothing?

Thank you, Meg. I thought I knew these books inside out but I learned so much from reading your comments!

Gamache doesn’t know, but it is in the book, in parts we have read, who Ruth signed that book for. Go back and look.

And why she signed it that way, too … though I had forgotten the perfume counter clerks by the time Gamache was trying to learn for whom she had signed it so.

I am truly drawing a blank on this one!! Perfume counter? Remember Clara there & think I recall something about Gamache giving Reine-Marie J. Patou’s “Joy” as a gift. That stuck because I always adored the scent of Joy, but couldn’t afford it back then! Wait! Wasn’t Clara complaining about being spritzed by all of the gals around the cosmetics/scent counters? Was Clara the one who ‘stinks” from all that spraying? Don’t have my book with me right now, but that’s all I can remember. Was the book inscribed for Clara & she dropped it or gave it to Elle? Would make sense for Ruth to write what she did to Clara then in that case. See! I love it when we can pick up what others miss! What good memories you have! ;~D

It was after being vomited on that Clara entered the store. She was then sprayed with perfume as she went through the store. Then Ruth made Clara buy her book, ultimately inscribing it to Clara. Phew.! Vomit and perfume! At this point we can assume Clara dropped the book when she went back, but that hasn’t been confirmed to Gamache.

Thanks Brian & Linda M.! I forgot about the perfume counter and Elle’s contribution to Clara’s aromas! Ruth was absolutely spot on with her ‘dedication:! :~D

The first husband of Eleanor of Aquitaine [de Poitiers] was was Louis VII of France [m. 1137–1152 – annulled]. Her first husband was Henry II, not of France but of England [m. 1152–1189]. Among their offspring was Richard I “The Lionhearted” and the evil King John of our childhood Robin Hood fame.
Good information on these pages:
http://www.womeninworldhistory.com/heroine2.html

It was to Clara that Ruth inscribed the book “You Stink, Love Ruth” because Clara had been “drenched” [as Mrs Harris would have said – Anne of Green Gables] by every perfume counter clerk she passed on her way to Ruth’s book launch. Clara purchased the book and Ruth signed it thus, and then Clara dropped it when she knelt down to give El the food and coffee, which is how it came to be in El’s possession. Did Ruth even know El? I think she was only known to The Three Graces.

Brian, Thanks for clarification of British & French royalty. I never could keep those English kings straight. Just remembered from reading this book that names CC chose for her parents were long-dead royals – which made it impossible for them to be her “French parents”. Green Gables!! Be still my heart! Loved these books as a tweener and even managed to see many of the commercial touristy sites for the series when I visited P.E.I. one summer on vacation! Remember biting black flies and pink sand beaches and absolutely incredible seafood – especially mussels! Yeah, I’m babbling & off subject! Thanks for reminder of Green Gables!

I, too, am puzzled about how Elle knew Clara’s name and how she might have seen any examples of Clara’s art. Did Clara imagine that Elle made this remark to her in the same way she believed this was God speaking to her? Or did Elle really say this? I kept expecting to learn that Elle had once seen Clara’s art in Three Pines.

1. I would very much love to live in a town like Three Pines. I live in a relatively small community now and like that you can know almost everyone in town. I would prefer however a warmer climate! LOL.

2. Favorite Character is so hard for me. I love them all individually. Each one brings their own unique affect to Three Pines, but if I had to choose one, it would always be Gamache. I wish he was real and I could get to spend a time talking with him.

3. I loved the “letter” that Lacoste wrote in chapter 18 to the Surete in Paris when she called to get info on CC de Portiers. I won’t repeat it here but it made me laugh out loud!.

4. I think that is true for most of us. As babies are we used to someone taking care of us, teaching us, guiding us. While the ideal is to grow up to be independent adults, who doesn’t like someone else to take care of things once in a while. What would our society be without the laws and rules of common decency.

5. Oh gosh, yeah, I would say most of us have. Everytime we make a decision about something, we bring all our own beliefs and sometimes baggage to the party. Detachment is one of the hardest things to achieve.

6. The fact that they seem to be complete opposites. One obsessively neat the other living on the street, dirty and unwashed. One is kind the other horrid. I don’t know, maybe they are two sides of the same puzzle.

From the first time I read Still Life I realized I would always want to live in a place like 3 Pines. The image of a Christmas time in that village is so magical. Cue the snow, lights on the trees, the caroling and Billy Williams giving the children the sled ride. How perfect but I have always felt the key to the solidarity is the close proximity of the homes of the major characters and the businesses in the town. Many others come in from the outer edges to come to the bistro, but it’s the inner circle that pulls it together.
My favorite character is always Gamache.
I swear everytime I re-read each book I gain 10 lbs since I do more cooking/baking and definitely more drinking! Especially after this long winter in Northern Wisconsin. We had half an inch of snow this morning.
Being more like Ruth than I care to imagine, I love her idea of most people liking to have others take control, since that is me trying to take control.
My entire life has been earmarked by moments of my thinking, “what the heck was I thinking?”
Elle’s death seemed so expected giving her lifestyle or lack of it. CC’s death seemed to be really unusual, but well deserved!

Peggy, I’ve a friend who has her epitaph ready: It Seemed Like A Good Idea At The Time.

1) I love Three Pines but I think I would be happiest there on holidays or summer vacations. That way I can stay at the B&B, with the wonderful white linens and the wonderful food. I could perhaps go on that sleigh ride with the grey gentle giants pulling me over the snow. I could sing silent night to the tune of “What Do You Do With a Drunken Sailor” on Christmas Eve and see dappled golden forest glades in the summer. A little cold is okay, but home again home again before I become too jaded by living such an idyllic existence.

2) I would love being able to read Ruths poetry while sharing the park bench with the woman we all know is FINE, not fine but FINE the acronym we are familiar with from the last book where we all first met Ruth. I love Clara. I love Gamache. I love Gabri. But, I will always find myself returning to the park bench and the grounding of the wise old grouch.

5) Authority is an odd thing. It seems that people chafe a little at authority. I think someone needs to be in charge. I just don’t want them to ACT like they are the boss of me. I want authority to be wielded by someone like Gamache. Gentle, kind, patient. He exercises authority discretely, showing sharpness only when necessary. He brings order by bringing out the best in those around him. He chastises only those that fail to be the kind of person they can and should be.

Three Pines is my fictional go-to place. Reading the Gamache books makes me long to leave the Southern California climes for Quebec to really see it.
Gamache comforts me always.
Food – well, that takes me back to visiting Quebec. I associate all that lovely food with the province.
Assumptions: yes. One of my biggest “aha!” moments came when I realized that whenever I insist that my assumption is correct or has merit (insist, mind you), I am inevitably wrong. I hope I have begun to hear myself better.
Finally, I felt so badly for Crie. Wish she had been given a better chance to heal in Three Pines.

I’ve listened to many of the books in the audio format. In fact, I prefer that method because Ralph Cosham makes the books really come alive. I hear the humor clearly, find I’m laughing out loud, and often have to replay some of the parts through which I’ve laughed because of the excellent job he does as the reader. He helps me to feel I’m in a French province.

If everyone who would like to live in Three Pines moved there, it wouldn’t be the perfect (though deadly) village that it is. I would LOVE to live there, but I would also love to preserve it for the knowledge that such a place exists.

Naturally, as Armand is my favourite character, I know that his being in Three Pines is a perfect spice to the quiet life. Ruth follows a close second as my favourite character, but her fear of expressing softer emotions puts Armand ahead of her.

My favourite lines come out of Ruth’s mouth, she is so insultingly caring. Her contention that everyone wants someone to take charge is a natural — cause we DO. We were taught that the parents would take charge and take care of us. We were taught that teachers, police, fire personnel are people who can take charge and protect. We are encouraged to stand out of the way and let them do the job. Husbands are to have hand skills, and wives are to have heart skills. Of course we want someone to take charge! We’ve hardly ever been told it was OUR job.

Assumptions can definitely be dangerous, leading to big mistakes if they are not tested. The scientific method we were taught in school starts with an assumption, however. If you forget to experiment, and test the assumption, your conclusions have a chance to be wrong and everything fall apart on you. That said, life itself is based on assumptions and they are tested daily. Conclusions drawn too soon can be as dangerous as the assumptions. When is the experiment of life over? I guess that could be when Armand Gamache comes in.

My own assumptions have been about my parents and my husband, dangerous items without assumptions, but assume I did. I assumed my parents would become wiser as I grew older, and of course, when I reached the age they were when I was born, this was not true. I’ve revised it to be that they were wise for their age, as I am for mine. (-8

I assumed my husband, who I loved very much and who loved me very much in return (a tested assumption) would always include my interests in his decisions and listen to my advice. Bad assumption, very bad. I learned over the years of our relationship to realize I had to ensure my own protection in his dealings.

The most interesting thing about the two victims is the way each became a victim so early in their lives of their perceptions of what was important in life. As opposed to how Clara chooses to believe that God loves her work, the two women find nothing but fear and loathing in their lives. The differing results prove the worth of Clara’s assumption.

I generally am in love with the series and the ‘reality’ that Louise steeps through everything. You are a WONDERFUL observer and recorder of humans, showing the good and the bad. As Myra H. said above, “Rarely do we meet such “real people” in fiction.” To be introduced to such is a dear gift to us all.

Thanks Louise, thanks!

Carol H.
Vancouver Island

Three Pines is a dream-scape for me, but I would go wherever Gabri and the bistro went (not to mention whatever place Reine-Marie found to her liking). Aside from the usual loves of Gamache and Reine-Marie, I care for Gabri and Ruth the most. The former for his exquisite kindness and generosity and the latter for her lack of pretense and her essential, hidden frailty and kindness. I have never met a curmudgeon I didn’t like.
And, yes, of course assumptions “presumed” are the usual causes of mistakes, whether they occur on the job or in personal life.
A Fatal Grace had a character I delighted to see as the victim; CC was a horror from the beginning; and her husband – an unforgivable coward who, by doing nothing, allowed his daughter to die inside. Moving to an overhead view of the series, each book seems another chapter in the lives of people we care about. The fact that the books are also murder mysteries which hold us through to the last pages further enriches the discoveries. And, by the way, Peter here shows, increasingly, his truer colors – not a character I’m liking very much; insecurity being the door to his thoughts.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The owner of this website has made a commitment to accessibility and inclusion, please report any problems that you encounter using the contact form on this website. This site uses the WP ADA Compliance Check plugin to enhance accessibility.