LOUISE PENNY’S

Series Re-Read: A Fatal Grace

INTRODUCTION BY HOPE DELLON

I started working with Louise in October 2006, after the editor who had bought her first three books left Minotaur for another company. At the time, only Still Life had been published. A Fatal Grace was in bound galleys, and The Cruelest Month was a completed manuscript in search of a title.

Since I needed to read three books in a row, it was lucky that I loved them from the start. Although Louise had me from the acknowledgments at the beginning of Still Life, there came a scene in A Fatal Grace that gave me chills in a way that only the very best manuscripts ever have. (I describe that scene in the recap below.) I even remember where I was when I read it. In those days I had an hour-long commute on the train. I know that I started reading the galleys on the train on a Tuesday night, then continued on Wednesday morning, when we always have our editorial meetings. By the time I got to that meeting, I couldn’t stop talking about how amazing Louise was, except perhaps to ignore everyone else and keep reading more of the story.

When I’m asked what makes her books so great, I usually fall back on a quote from Emily Dickinson: “If I read a book [and] it makes my whole body so cold no fire ever can warm me I know that is poetry. If I feel physically as if the top of my head were taken off, I know that is poetry. These are the only ways I know it. Is there any other way?” That’s how I feel about Louise’s novels.

I believe I didn’t meet Louise and her husband, Michael, in person until Malice Domestic in Crystal City, VA, in the spring of 2008. By that time, Still Life had won many awards (including the Anthony, Arthur Ellis, Barry, Dilys, and New Blood Dagger) for Best First Novel, but not the Agatha; and we didn’t want to jinx anything by expecting her to win Best Novel for A Fatal Grace. I remember how thrilling it was when she did win—but what I had forgotten, until Louise mentioned it recently, was that the awards banquet happened to fall on my birthday. Now that she reminds me—and how remarkable for her to remember—I know that she and Michael insisted on taking me to lunch on that Saturday, and made more of a fuss about my birthday than they did about her chances of winning the Agatha. They were as warm and brilliant and funny as you might imagine from reading Louise’s books, and it’s been a joy to work with her ever since.

RECAP

Chapters 1-21: The first lines of A Fatal Grace foretell the death of the nastiest woman in Three Pines: “Had CC de Poitiers known she was going to be murdered she might have bought her husband, Richard, a Christmas gift….” The doomed CC has written a self-help book that prattles about love and enlightenment, even though she is actually like the Snow Queen from the fairytale who pierces everyone’s hearts with ice.

Meanwhile, in “the snow globe that was Three Pines,” CC’s 14-year-old daughter, Crie, has sewn her own chiffon snowflake costume for her school’s Christmas pageant, “to surprise Mommy.” She has been on a diet for a month and is sure her mother will notice soon. Except her mother doesn’t bother to show up.

Clara Morrow and her friend Myrna drive to Montreal, where Clara is dying to see the Christmas windows at Ogilvy’s department store that have enchanted her since childhood. She and her handsome husband, Peter, have been starving artists in Three Pines for years, although his precisely detailed paintings have finally started to sell. No one wants to buy Clara’s wilder depictions of warrior uteruses (!) and melting trees.

Hearing that CC knows important gallery owner Denis Fortin, Clara timidly asks if she would mind showing him her portfolio—which CC disdainfully throws in the trash. “Very annoying,” she says to her lover, photographer Saul Petrov. “Imagine asking me for a favor?” CC has much more important things to do: There’s a sale at Ogilvy’s and she wants to buy a special pair of boots made of baby sealskin with metal claws.

Clara’s joy at the Christmas windows is disrupted by a filthy pile of blankets that turns out to be a beggar throwing up. Disgusted, Clara hastens inside to the book launch for her neighbor, Ruth Zardo, the bitter but brilliant old poet whose friends from Three Pines turn up to support her.

On the escalators at Ogilvy’s, Clara passes CC, who says to the man beside her, “I’m so sorry, Denis, that you think Clara’s art is amateur and banal.” It’s a heart-stopping moment. Devastated, Clara shuffles out of the store and sees the stinking beggar she’d ignored on the way in. Impulsively, Clara gives a package of food she’s just bought to the bag lady, who grasps her wrist and says, “I have always loved your art, Clara.” Whoa. This was the moment when I started to feel as if the top of my head was being taken off.

A few days later it is Christmas Eve in Three Pines, with shortbread stars (Louise’s books always make me hungry) and carolers and a midnight service at St. Thomas’s church, where a child starts to sing with angelic purity. The singer is CC’s daughter, wearing a grotesque pink sundress but with bliss on her face. After the service, the whole village can hear CC berating Crie as a “stupid, stupid girl. You humiliated me. They were laughing at you, you know.” CC’s gutless father barely utters a protest.

When Saul turns up at the Bistro on Christmas, Myrna invites him to the community breakfast and curling match on the following day. It’s a perfect setting for the last job Saul intends to do for CC, who wants pictures of herself “frolicking among the natives at Christmas. If possible he had to get shots of the locals looking at CC with wonder and affection.” A pretty tall order.

Chief Inspector Armand Gamache of the Sûreté and his wife, Reine-Marie, make their first appearance in the book on the day after Christmas, when they have a tradition of reviewing unsolved cases. “If I was murdered,” says Gamache, “I’d like to think the case wouldn’t just sit unsolved. Someone would make an extra effort.” (I love this man.) Reine-Marie notices that one of the cases is new: There was a bag lady who had hung out at the bus station for years—but was strangled outside of Ogilvy’s department store on the day Clara saw her there. Astoundingly, a copy of Ruth’s new book, signed “You stink, love Ruth,” was found with the body.

Then the phone rings, and the duty officer for Three Pines tells Gamache there has been a murder. So much for a quiet Boxing Day. Within minutes Gamache and his second-in-command, Inspector Jean-Guy Beauvoir, are on their way to Three Pines, to investigate the very odd death of CC de Poitiers.

CC’s murder seems impossible: She was electrocuted at the curling match, in the middle of a frozen lake in front of dozens of witnesses. After Gamache gathers his team in the old railway station, Beauvoir recaps the only way CC’s murder could have worked: “A: she had to be standing in water; B: she had to have taken off her gloves; C: she had to touch something electrified; and D: she had to be wearing metal on the bottom of her boots.” Sure, nobody liked CC, but who hated her enough—and had the expertise—to pull off something like that?

Then a new team member arrives unexpectedly: Agent Yvette Nichol—”the rancid, wretched, petty little woman who’d almost ruined their last case”—apparently sent by the Superintendent of the Sûreté. Gamache is furious to see her, and knows that his enemies at Headquarters are still working against him.

With or without the unwelcome Nichol, the team has much to investigate: Where is Saul and what photos might he have taken of the curling match? Why does the coroner find excess niacin in CC’s body? Can it be possibly be coincidence that CC’s book, Be Calm, has the same name as the meditation center Bea Mayer, known as Mother, runs in Three Pines? After Gamache admires The Three Graces, Clara’s painting of Mother and the two other elderly women who are her best friends in Three Pines, she tells him about her poisonous encounter with CC at Ogilvy’s—and he quietly adds Clara’s name to the long list of suspects.

Chapter 22-End: Clues and questions and suspects continue to pile up for Gamache and his team. Having learned that CC de Poitiers, who claimed to be the daughter of Eleanor and Henri de Poitiers, invented both her name and her past (Eleanor de Poitiers, better known as Eleanor of Aquitaine, actually died in 1204), Gamache needs to find out who CC really was. Are there any significant clues to be found in the video cassette of The Lion in Winter that turned up in CC’s garbage after the murder?

Meanwhile, Gamache is astonished when Clara proudly shows him the Li Bien ornament Peter gave her for Christmas, which is exactly like the ball CC supposedly used as the basis for her garbled philosophy. The glass ball is painted with three pine trees, the word Noël, and a single capital letter, L. Was it the picture of the trees that prompted CC to buy the monstrous old Hadley house in Three Pines? Awkwardly, Peter is forced to confess that while he meant to buy Clara something for Christmas this year, he actually found the ball in the Williamsburg dump.

When Gamache meets Émilie Longpré—age 82, captain of the curling team, and one of Clara’s Three Graces—and her dog, Henri, on an early morning walk, she tells him about an encounter with CC at Mother’s meditation center, where CC arrogantly proclaimed that since she was calling her own book and company Be Calm, Mother would have to change the name of her center or perhaps close it altogether. After breakfast, the tiny Émilie gives Gamache & co. a curling lesson that convinces even Beauvoir, who has always scoffed at curling as a sport, that it’s a lot harder than it looks. And Gamache, who finally grasps what it meant when the 78-year-old Mother loudly “cleared the house” at the curling match, suddenly knows how the murderer got away with it.

The questions about CC’s mother keep circling back to the Three Graces. Do they know who the L of the Li Bien ball was, or could it possibly even be one of them? And what might 92-year-old Kaye Thompson, who was sitting next to CC at the match, have seen as she was murdered?

When Saul’s photos are developed, they somehow do not include any shots from the time of the murder. And as eager as Saul seems to be to start a new, better life in Three Pines, he still has one undeveloped roll of film that he hastily throws in the fireplace when Gamache and his team visit him at the chalet he has rented.

With the help of an idea from Clara about the discarded video, the case seems to be coming together, when a raging fire breaks out at Saul’s chalet, and the unlikely trio of Gamache, Beauvoir, and Agent Nichol try to rescue him. Émilie finally tells Gamache the heartbreaking truth about CC’s mother, and the Three Graces prepare to pay the price for what they have done. And then Gamache suddenly realizes there is one last horrible secret in CC’s family.

The book ends at New Year’s, with Reine-Marie’s first visit to Three Pines. Both of them know that the plots against Gamache are growing more sinister, but as they drive home:

In the rearview mirror Armand Gamache could see Three Pines. He got out of the car and stared down at the village, each home glowing with warm and beckoning light, promising protection against a world sometimes too cold. He closed his eyes and felt his racing heart calm.

“Are you all right?” Reine-Marie’s mittened hand slipped into his.

“I’m more than all right.” He smiled. “I have everything.”

FAVORITE QUOTE

Gamache says to Clara, “When someone stabs you it’s not your fault that you feel pain.”

Gamache: “I knew then I was in the company of people who loved not only books, but words. Spoken, written, the power of words.”

CONCLUSION

I am not sure how many times I’ve read A Fatal Grace, but I still find it as extraordinary as I did back in 2006. I think it’s magnificent on so many levels: as a complex and masterful detective story, as a glorious character study, and as an exploration of universal hopes and fears. I love that it can be hilarious one minute and heartbreaking the next.

I also love the way Louise focuses on the power of words, from the literal handwriting on more than one wall, to the hidden meanings of names like Mother, Elle, and Crie (what kind of parents would name a child that?), to the ways that words can kill or heal. I also marvel that someone like me, who is at least as much of a skeptic as Jean-Guy Beauvoir, can find myself wondering about such mysteries as lemon meringue pie.

DISCUSSION QUESTIONS

  1. If the village of Three Pines truly existed, would you want to live there? Why or why not? How does Christmas bring out the best or the worst in any of the villagers?
  1. Who is your favorite character in the book so far?
  1. In Louise’s books I am always stopping to admire wonderful images or jokes or observations (or descriptions of food!). Were there any lines that particularly struck you in Part I?
  1. What do you think of Ruth’s idea that “most people, while claiming to hate authority, actually yearned for someone to take charge”?
  1. Gamache tells Lemieux, “All the mistakes I’ve made have been because I’ve assumed something and then acted as though it was fact.” Have you ever made important assumptions that turned out not to be true?
  1. What interests you most about the two murder victims, CC and the bag lady known only as Elle, and the way Gamache conducts his investigation?
  1. There are so many clues hidden in plain sight in A Fatal Grace, I lost count at 6 or 7 (all of which I missed the first time through). Did you spot any of them, and did you solve any of the various puzzles before Gamache did?
  1. What do you make of Gamache’s relationships with the different members of his team, from Beauvoir to Nichol?
  1. How do you feel about The Three Graces?
  1. Near the end, Gamache says, “This whole case has been about belief and the power of the word.” I’ll say. What are the ways in which words have power?
  1. Speaking of belief, what do you make of the apparent brushes with God: the beggar who loved Clara’s art (which Em maintains she had never seen); Gamache finding God in a diner eating lemon meringue pie; Em’s road worker with the sign saying “Ice Ahead”; Billy Williams, etc.?
  1. Do you agree with Gamache in Chapter 33 that “when you’ve seen the worst you appreciate the best?”

A Fatal Grace, Part 2

Clues and questions and suspects continue to pile up for Gamache and his team. Having learned that CC de Poitiers, who claimed to be the daughter of Eleanor and Henri de Poitiers, invented both her name and her past (Eleanor de Poitiers, better known as Eleanor of Aquitaine, actually died in 1204), Gamache needs to find out who CC really was. Are there any significant clues to be found in the video cassette of The Lion in Winter that turned up in CC's garbage after the murder? Meanwhile, Gamache is astonished when Clara proudly shows him the Li Bien ornament Peter gave her for Christmas, which is exactly like the ball CC supposedly used as the basis for her garbled philosophy. The glass ball is painted with three pine trees, the word Noël, and a single capital letter, L. Was it the picture of the trees that prompted CC to buy the monstrous old Hadley house in Three Pines? Awkwardly, Peter is forced to confess that while he meant to buy Clara something for


READ FULL POST

A Fatal Grace, Part 1

I started working with Louise in October 2006, after the editor who had bought her first three books left Minotaur for another company. At the time, only Still Life had been published. A Fatal Grace was in bound galleys, and The Cruelest Month was a completed manuscript in search of a title. Since I needed to read three books in a row, it was lucky that I loved them from the start. Although Louise had me from the acknowledgments at the beginning of Still Life, there came a scene in A Fatal Grace that gave me chills in a way that only the very best manuscripts ever have. (I describe that scene in the recap below.) I even remember where I was when I read it. In those days I had an hour-long commute on the train. I know that I started reading the galleys on the train on a Tuesday night, then continued on Wednesday morning, when we always have our editorial meetings. By the time I got to that meeting, I couldn’t stop talking about how amazi


READ FULL POST

AuthorHOPE DELLON was an executive editor at both St. Martin’s Press and Minotaur Books. Hope edited Louise Penny from 2006 until her passing in 2020.

388 replies on “Series Re-Read: A Fatal Grace”

I feel I have entered a new world of reading as I go through all these ideas and responses to these books that have become so important to me. As well as reading the books I have listened to the narrated versions and some I have listened to more than once. They are so entertaining. I too could be trapped in traffic and not mind if I was listening to one of the novels.

I love the re-read. I’m finding beautiful descriptive phrases and sentences that are so well written, such as the one describing the Christmas caroling in one of the early chapters:
“The singers moved from house to house through the snowy village filling the night air with old hymns and laughter and puffs of breath plump with songs and snowflakes.”
You can see it, feel it and hear it all. That’s good writing, when your senses are all awakened with words.

THE THREE GRACES:
Since this book is called “A Fatal Grace” – doesn’t the title beg us to consider the three graces (Emilie, Kaye and Mother Bea) – both in terms of their individual stories that we learned the night of Emilie’s Christmas party – and in terms of Clara’s four paintings of them (3 individual portraits and one large group one that includes all three)? Something else to think about: is the ‘grace’ of the title one of these three women – or a characteristic? Any takers?

THREE GRACES

How do we apply the title as well as Claras art to the women who are depicted as the images of the three graces?

In Greek mythology, the charities (Romans called them Graces) were often depicted as the daughters of Zeus, the attendants of Aphrodite. The most common three were Aglaia who represented beauty, Euphrosyne who represented delight or mirth, and Thalia who represented blossom or abundance.

In Christianity the graces are said to be virtue, knowledge, temperance, patience, godliness, kindness, and charity.

Is there some analogy here? I have more of an inclination to the former rather than the latter. However, I think this discussion would be more appropriate to the discussion of the second part of our read. I don’t want to leave more spoilers here in explaining my reasoning.

Running errands all day & still musing about

FAVORITE CHARACTER(S) Q!
You know, I can’t just come up with only one or two or three. It’s much easier for me to list ones that I’ve disliked: Yolande, her husband Andre, their despicable kid Bernard the Bully; definitely CC in this book & her husband R. Lyon because he doesn’t protect/defend their child; Pouty Peter Morrow is on my Nuh-uh list too because of how he treats Clara and is soooo self-centered and totally oblivious to feelings of others. Even when it was blatantly proven that he had been duped by Ben Hadley for years, absolutely no self-reflection about his own choices, perceptionz or attitudes. Although he’s not in this book, Ben Hadley makes this list because he was a liar and never grew a pair, never grew up and blamed Mommy for his own failures and lacks.

I really, really like the rest of them and they’re why I keep coming back for ‘the next book.’ Louise Penny’s created characters who engage us, whom we actually care about. Gamache & Reine-Marie seem to be the compassionately moral center of this group with a strong and solid marriage. They obviously adore each other and are absolutely comfortable sharing ideas and feelings with no hesitation.
The “Cop Crowd”: Jean-Guy, I have a soft spot for him. He’s obviously the one whom Armand trusts the most as his second in command. Gamache understands him and his weaknesses. What I find endearing is J-G’s feeling that he needs to protect Gamach , and – though he may not have put it in so many words, sees his superior as a nurturing father figure. What I find amusing about J-G is his lack of patience with the trainee Nichol at times. Isn’t there some line about what we strongly dislike in others often is a characteristic of our own which we don’t want to face?
Isabelle Lacoste is who I want to be when I grow up! She’s managed to establish balance in her own life in terms of home, family and work. She’s the level headed one on the team who can pull Jean-Guy’s feet back to planet earth when he goes off on a strange logic leap. Plus, she’s confident and has a sense of humor and knows who & what she is. Brecault and Lemieux seem to be ‘good guys’ so far too, as well as the coroner Dr. Susan (?)
Yvette Nichol – Yes, a royal pain in the ass. She has so much growing up to do that I can understand partially her bad choices, assumptions and actions. I’m holding out hope for her that she does come out on the other side of her self-absorption.
“The Villagers” – Who’s not to love? Gabby Gabri with his big belly & big heart wit and fearlessness, Cranky, crabby Ruth – I think I associate with her curmudgeoness. (it’s fun to play that role sometimes.) She just makes me chuckle and weep for her at the same time. Clara & Myrna – both good souls and ‘artists’ in their own ways. Clara’s intuition and understanding are revealed through her ‘artist’s eye’ and in her paintings, Myrna’s in her practical understandings of human behavior. Ollie (Olivier) is the only one of the core villagers that I really don’t seem to have a real sense of as a person. He puts price tags on everything, runs his bistro and kissed Gabri’s hand in “Still Life” during the vandalism scene, but that’s all I know about him.
I just can’t choose a favorite. Also can’t pick A favorite book or A favorite film or A favorite stage performance or A favorite song or piece of music either!

Meg – very interesting observation about Beauvoir’s aversion to Nichol as a reflection of his own weaknesses. Is this what Jung called “the shadow”: disliking others for traits that subconsciously remind us of ourselves?

Don’t know, Hope. Really not up on Jung. Know I’ve heard and read the point a number of times over the years.

I could not live in Three Pines because of the cold. My favorite character in the books is Gamache – I love his relationship with his wife, Reine-Marie. I agree with Ruth — everyone bleats on and on about personal freedoms until something horrible happens. Then we want someone to come along who will tell us what to do.

I thought I placed both of the above under Portia’s and Linda Maday and Penny’s comments (p. 3 of discussion) about CC as a one-dimensional character or person. Help!

Thank you, Portia, for your question. I have had the same feeling. And thank you, Linda, for your great answer. I had completely forgotten (or maybe missed) that description of CC’s thoughts. Those memories were heartbreaking. Each time I have read this #2 book of the series, I have read quickly through the parts about CC, especially when she’s alone in her scary head. So, I allowed myself to avoid her private thoughts. This is a good lesson: assume every part in a Louise Penny book is important, really! I found both CC and Yolanda in Still Life to be one- dimensional–now I think it was my lack of attention to them. I have not been dismissive of the feelings/memories/worst thoughts of any of the other characters in the books, so why these? Something for me to think about.

Now I have just read Portia’s comment. Thank you too; more wise, spot-on ideas.

“A mitten shot out, black with muck . . . ” No on has mentioned, but this image was so vivid! How often we find treasure where we least expect it! Diamonds amongst the rocks, pearls in oysters, the voice of God in a gutter. After a struggle, after being chipped, stained, beaten down, vomited on. There it is! Did we deserve it?

😀 Linda, check back on VICTIMS: CC & ELLE for full quote of that mitten covered with black muck line!

Yes, it was there that I had one of my aha moments. Part of why I love these discussions so much!

3. I’d like to say that it’s the brilliant imagery, the introspective writing and character development, the plotting … but I’m all about the humor. It’s intelligent (of course, I’d think so), subtle, well-timed, and wonderfully in character of each person. The banter is utterly delightful — Gabri is a hoot. Myrna is a self-possessed woman who can blithely send her friend off on a quest to find the hair salon of Sigfried Sassoon. Clara chides her for it while laughing until she cries. And …. Ruth. Ruth could call me anything. Drinking scotch out of a vase (because that’s the size drink she wants and it’s someone else’s scotch!). Even nasty, damaged, sociopathic CC’s wonderful self-promoting monolog about being adored by “Raman Dass.” It’s gratifying when braggarts get it wrong. (I’m assuming she wasn’t referring to the ayurveda practitioner.) I feel privileged to be invited into the Three Pines world where Louise’s characters share their familiarity and affection for each other by calling each other names, pointing out their foibles (which I feel is more a statement of appreciation than criticism). Sorry for being long-winded. Love these books.

My Ohio friends and I are so in love with Three Pines that we went on map quest to make an educated guess as to where it would be and planned a trip to the area. We also ordered licorice pipes from The Vermont Store and Three Pines mugs from the Canadian bookstore and went to the local Tim Horton’s and had coffee and pipes and pretended we had arrived. Yes, we would love to live there.

I actually love Gabri he could easily be my best friend I’d go to him for
fun, to cry, to be a total ass and Gabri could do the same and we would still love each other. In a later book I completely hurt for Gabri, what’s not to LOVE.

I wonder why Ms.Penny chose to make CC so one-dimensional. Did anyone else find this? I kept waiting for some explanation for CC’s nastiness. Ms. Penny is so good at showing all the nuances to her other characters.

In what we’ve read so far, Louise revealed a great deal when CC stood in the hotel room and thought about the ball. “Her mother was on the floor now, rocking and crying, and CC was desperate for her to stop. Desperate to shut her up, silence her, calm her before the neighbors called the police again and again her mother was taken away. And CC was left alone, in the company of strangers.”

So much was revealed here about CC and the cause for the devastation of her life.

I think Linda Maday has focused on the key to CC. She is one dimensional because her whole being has become focused toward defending herself from the nightmare that was her life as a child. This really can happen. A person can make themselves one dimensional in such a way that it becomes very difficult for others to have compassion for the damage that caused them to flatten out their character into a one-sided shield against EVERYTHING. Horrible, she became, horrified is where she started. Another reminder not to judge, because you don’t know what burden the other person is carrying . . . although in CC’s case that surely did not give her the right to abuse others and her daughter in that horrible way. Miraculous are the people who suffer such wrongs, and rise enlightened from the fire.

Perhaps we each have a Three Pines within us, a place of centeredness and equanimity. Do we all have a little of each character within us? Including CC? I’m betting they are all there, if we pay attention. The wonder of Three Pines is that it endures despite murder, mayhem, loss and sorrow. It accepts the vicissitudes of the way, adjusts as needed while staying true to itself. And we all need an Armand Gamache to help us stay on course.

Favorite character? Who else but Ruth? The dialogue between Gabri and Ruth is fabulous. Wouldn’t it be grand to have someone to spar with like that?

On assumptions. We all make them. To me, the caveat of the quote is “…and then acted as though it was fact.”

This is fun!

1. I too would love to live in Three Pines, there is such a sense of community, and living just outside Ottawa I am used to the winters. Three Pines feels like a traditional English village, buildings surrounding a village green, just like where I grew up. The Bistro with its good food, drink, soft comfy sofas and armchairs and the roaring fire, to the Book Shop where you could spend an afternoon browsing the shelves, and then sitting on the bench on the green watching the world go by. Perfect!!
2. My favourite character has to be Ruth. She makes me smile with the things she says. I love the way she doesn’t care about what people think of her. She seems like she doesn’t like people, wants to keep herself to herself, however, she’s still goes to the Bistro and is always having supper at Clara’s, so she still wants to be a part of the community and know there are people around her. I can’t wait to find out a little more about her.
4. People need authority, rules, regulations, that’s what we’ve been taught growing up. People like to know who is responsible, who’s in charge especially if there is a problem, it takes away the worry, anxiousness and confusion.

Regarding assumptions based on what we THINK we know, Louise Penny neatly captures readers with one such assumption in the chapter when Nichol packs her bag and returns to Three Pines. It is very cleverly done, and it definitely caught me the first time I read the novel. She does a great job of showing us how we ourselves can be involved in mistaken assumptions as well as exploring those of the main characters.

Yaaaa! I’m with Mary Ogletree and her love of the characters. The mystery is fine but the characters rule! They keep me coming back to read and re-read…to enjoy Louise’s priceless sense of humor and love.

Both CC and Elle are shunned. I believe CC is nasty (and she is nasty!) to hide her insecurities and fears of being unloveable. She has fabricated a personal life history to try to be accepted into society. Elle has stopped trying to live within society by leaving it and living on the streets.

I have two favourite characters. Ruth because of her crusty wisdom and Clara because she is going through such growth professionally and personally.

Three Pines is a geographic village (fictional) it houses the emotional community that the Gamache novels cover. The books are about a group of friends in a small village. These emotional communities can and do exist in downtown Toronto (except they would miss the Francophone/Anglophone tensions) or in rural Newfoundland. Would I live in the Eastern Townships? Most definitely! Would I seek out an emotional community? Most defnitely!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The owner of this website has made a commitment to accessibility and inclusion, please report any problems that you encounter using the contact form on this website. This site uses the WP ADA Compliance Check plugin to enhance accessibility.