LOUISE PENNY’S

Series Re-Read: Still Life

A NOTE FROM LOUISE PENNY:

Welcome to the first meeting of the Three Pines Book Club—gathering in this virtual location of Myrna’s New and Used Bookshop.

Our first book to re-read is Still Life. I suspect most of you have already read it, but I also think some of you might be new to the series.

The novels are set, for the most part, in the fictional Quebec village of Three Pines.

I created the village as a place of refuge. A place I would choose to live. That was beautiful, and peaceful. That offered company, companionship—as well as croissants and rich café au lait. And licorice pipes.

I was much taken, years ago, when reading Virginia Woolf’s Orlando. Orlando, the main character, had lived many lifetimes in many guises. Now, I’m paraphrasing the opening of that book, but Woolf wrote something to the effect that over the years, in each of those lifetimes, Orlando was looking for only one thing. It wasn’t riches. It wasn’t power. It wasn’t even love.

What Orlando yearned for was company.

I’d been through periods in my life when I thought I would die from loneliness. And so the idea of belonging, of company, of home, was powerful.

The world, when I started writing Still Life, was suddenly a pretty scary place. 9/11 had happened the year before and more attacks seemed imminent and would almost certainly be completely unexpected. Suddenly places and activities that had seemed benign, safe, fun, were riddled with insecurity.

I wanted to pull the sheets up over my head, stay in bed, and read.

But, like you, I couldn’t. But what I could do was create that safe place.

Oddly, perhaps, I also chose to violate it—by bringing murder into the pretty little village, and into the lives of Clara, Peter, Ruth et al.

But it also brought Chief Inspector Gamache. The decent man, who made a living investigating the indecent act of homicide.

Just as I created a community I would live in in Three Pines, and villagers I would choose as friends in Clara and Myrna and Gabri etc—I also intentionally created, in Armand, a man I would marry. Because, in many ways, I knew if Still Life spawned a series it would become like a marriage. And he needed to have the qualities I admire in a man. In anyone. The qualities I strive for, and so often fall short of, myself.

But peace untested might prove an illusion. And so Three Pines is tested when Miss Jane Neal is murdered.

And goodness might be shallow, situational. And so Gamache is given Agent Nichol to test him and, more insidious, the Arnot case. To see if he really is a decent man, or just pretending to be when things are going his way. The first reference to Arnot is in Still Life—it clearly refers to something horrific, but unexplained, in Gamache’s past. And in the recent history of the Sûreté du Quebec.

This was intentional. It was important that it be clear that all these characters have pasts, and we are coming in mid-life, mid-leap. But, as with new friends, all will eventually be revealed.

Here now, in Still Life, we are introduced to Gabri and Olivier, to Ruth, the demented old poet. To Clara, who creates art from her heart, and Peter, the more successful artist in their marriage. To Ben, who never strays far from home, and Myrna, who found a home in Three Pines. And all the other villagers whose lives mix and join together. From here their stories move forward, but we also see further and further back. To what made them who they are.

These books are murder mysteries, but they’re not about murder. They’re about love and belonging, about loyalty and choices. And the courage to be good.

INTRODUCTION BY LESA HOLSTINE:

I recently heard Louise Penny interviewed by her publisher, and, knowing Louise now, it came as a surprise to hear her say she identified with Agent Yvette Nichol. However, here’s the final paragraph in the Acknowledgements in Still Life. “I went through a period in my life when I had no friends, when the phone never rang, when I thought I would die from loneliness. I know that the real blessing here isn’t that I have a book published, but that I have so many people to thank.” I never knew that lonely Louise. She herself is an example of the duality she writes about. I see her much more as Clara Morrow, and, she has said that as well. (Doesn’t an author put herself into many characters?) Clara is a kind woman, who really wants to belong. I only know that Louise Penny, the warm, kind woman who reaches out to others.

I first read Still Life in 2006, and met Louise in 2008 at The Poisoned Pen Bookstore in Scottsdale, Arizona. I saw a woman who reached out to every member of the small audience. I’ve repeated this story often. There was one teen in the audience, dragged there by her mother. She had headphones on. Louise started by asking her age, and when she was told thirteen, she asked if she’d read Rick Riordan’s mythological series, Percy Jackson and the Olympians. That teen was at every subsequent appearance I attended at The Poisoned Pen.

I know the Louise Penny who loves gummi bears. (Did you catch those references in Still Life?) I know the friend who always found time to squeeze in a short visit when she was in town, and I found how she listened with her heart. I know the Louise Penny who wrote me after my husband died. “I am devastated for you, as is Michael. . . . Oh, Lesa . . . our hearts break for you. How are you? Would you like to come up? Spend quiet time away and we could look after you? . . . When you feel like it please write and tell us how you are. Michael sends his love and grief, as do I. Actually, we don’t send our grief—you probably have way too much of that already. We send light. And peace.”

I know the Louise Penny of light and peace.

I know the Louise Penny who created Three Pines. She may have needed it as a refuge at one time. Fortunately for all of us, she created a place that can only be found by people who are lost. Three Pines has sheltered many lost souls.

So, welcome to Three Pines and Still Life.

RECAP

Before we meet anyone else, readers meet the victim, Jane Neal, and the investigator, Armand Gamache. We learn a little about each in just a couple paragraphs. Jane was unmarried, seventy-six, and her death was not natural. She was kind and gentle. Gamache is in his mid-fifties, “at the height of a long and now apparently stalled career”, and, even though he was head of homicide, he was always surprised by violent death, hoping it was wrong.

Still Life is more than a murder mystery. Penny has said her books are not really about murder, but what murder dislodges in a community. And, the first half of this book introduces the community. We meet Clara Morrow and her husband Peter. They are both artists, but Peter is a success, while Clara is unknown in the art world. We learn that beyond marijuana, Three Pines had no crime. “No break-ins, no vandalism, no assaults. There weren’t even any police in Three Pines.” So, Jane’s report of an unspeakable action perpetrated by some boys came as a shock. She recognized the boys under their masks, and called out their names.

The Friday before Thanksgiving, we meet a small group of friends at a dinner at the Morrow home. Ruth Zardo is swigging Scotch. Olivier Brulé and Gabri Dubeau are the two gay men who own the Bistro, victims of the hate crime witnessed by Jane Neal. Myrna Landers, “huge, effusive, and unexpected”, is the owner of the bookstore, Ben Hadley is Peter’s best friend. Jane is celebrating the acceptance of her picture, Fair Day, for the local exhibition. When she tells them the picture was painted at the closing parade of the county fair, they all remember it was the day Peter and Clara had to tell Ben his mother, Timmer, had died while he was in Ottawa. Despite that sad recollection, Jane invites them to have drinks at her house after the opening of the exhibition.

It’s into this village that Armand Gamache brings his team. Yvette Nichol is a young agent, on her first case, desperate to make a good impression. Inspector Jean Guy Beauvoir has been Gamache’s second-in-command for more than a decade, a man who hears Gamache’s command, “Tell me what you know”, as the beginning of the hunt. Isabelle Lacoste is the agent who, walking to the site where Jane Neal died, promises her Chief Inspector Gamache would find out who killed her.

These two groups of people are brought together under the watchful eye of Armand Gamache. It’s important to know all of these characters, people who continue to show up in the series. It’s most important to see Gamache, and recognize his style of investigation.. “I watch. I’m very good at observing. Noticing things. And listening. Actively listening to what people are saying, their choice of words, their tone. What they aren’t saying.”

It doesn’t take the team long to discover that Jane Neal was killed, shot by an arrow. In a meeting of the villagers, Peter, Ben, and Matthew Croft reveal how many of them are familiar with bows and arrows, how many of them hunt, and that Jane Neal was known to confront those who were doing wrong, from Croft, who was caught hunting illegally, to the three boys who attacked Gabri and Olivier. But, Jane Neal’s death still bothers Gamache. “And that’s the puzzle, thought Gamache. Why? Why an arrow and not a bullet?…An old-fashioned wooden arrow with real feathers used to kill an elderly retired schoolteacher. Why?”

The investigation immediately swings toward looking for someone who shot that arrow, even while Gamache is interested in other aspects of Jane Neal’s life. Who inherits her estate? Naturally, the heirs are always suspect. And, Jane’s niece, Yolande, is an angry, hard woman. Who else might have reasons to wish her dead? Her painting, Fair Day, had just been accepted for Arts Williamsburg, because it was brilliant. Were other artists jealous? Clara pointed out that only a small group of friends knew the painting had been accepted, and they were all close enough for Jane to invite them to her house. So, who had the bows and arrows, the ability to kill Jane Neal?

The investigation leads to the Croft family. Matthew Croft, who hunted illegally, was once caught by Jane Neal. The police find Matthew’s wife, Suzanne, trying to hide something from them in the basement. And, then, there’s fourteen-year-old Philippe, one of the boys Jane caught attacking Olivier and Gabri. While the police wait for the results of lab tests, suspecting they found the home of the killer, Gamache decides to try out other theories. He doesn’t like to close a case too early. “Just to be on the safe side.”

As Gamache waits, he learns more about the villagers. Ruth Zardo is one of Canada’s most famous poets. And, Clara and the villagers have a different view of the deceased Timmer Hadley than Myrna did. They’ve known Timmer longer, as Ben’s mother, a hateful woman who terrorized her son.

And, as the villagers wait, they once again gather at Clara and Peter’s where they deconstruct the crime, and realizing one of them is a killer, they know someone killed Jane Neal on purpose. Readers who want to continue the series should watch the scenes in which the villagers gather because there are glimpses of their true characters in these moments.

When the lab results come in, the team once again visit the Crofts, where Philippe turns on his father, but Matthew Croft’s confession isn’t enough to convince Gamache of his guilt, and he refuses to arrest him, going against orders. Gamache is suspended, and Beauvoir is forced to take his gun and badge from him.

It’s while attending Jane Neal’s memorial service and reception that Gamache realizes one of his officers lied to him, and didn’t check on Jane Neal’s will. And, when the women of the village hold a prayer ritual, they discover another piece of evidence, an arrow that was still in a tree. That piece of evidence exonerates Matthew Croft, proves Jane Neal really was murdered, and it wasn’t an accident, and brings about the reinstatement of Gamache as officer in charge of the investigation.

And, it was the will, leaving everything to Clara, that opens Jane Neal’s house to the police. They find horrific wallpaper and paint in the house, but, when they look beneath it, they discover Jane Neal’s gift to the community. Her paintings on her walls reveal the history of Three Pines. And, Gamache knows that the murderer was someone on those walls as well.

But, it’s Clara, the artist, who is the first to realize who the killer is. And, her attempt to confront the killer leads to a horrifying scene, and a rescue attempt during a hurricane. The discovery of the murderer would change the villagers forever.

Louise Penny, a master storyteller, foreshadows so many of the relationships and actions in future books when she talks about her characters. Remember the characters, their reactions, their feelings, as you read future books. And, remember Three Pines. “And the pall of grief that settled on this little community was worn with dignity and sadness and a certain familiarity. This village was old, and you don’t get to be old without knowing grief. And loss.”

But, also remember Armand Gamache’s last view of Three Pines. “He looked down at the village and his heart soared. He looked over the rooftops and imagined the good, kind, flawed people inside struggling with their lives….Life was far from harried here. But neither was it still.”

FAVORITE QUOTES:

Ruth Zardo quotes poet W.H. Auden. “Evil is unspectacular and always human, and shares our bed and eats at our own table.”

Matthew 10:36. “And a man’s foes shall be they of his own household.

CONCLUSION:

As we read the other books in this series, it’s important to remember what we’ve learned about the characters. Keep in mind what you’ve learned about Gamache, Beauvoir, and Nichol, as well as about the villagers themselves; Clara, Peter, Olivier, Gabri, Ruth and Myrna. And, remember what Louise Penny said. Her books are not really about murder, but what murder dislodges in a community.

In a 2007 interview with author G.M. Malliet, Louise Penny said, “I think of Three Pines as a state of mind. A village occupied by people who have made conscious choices in their lives. Not because they’ve never been hurt, not because they’re too protected, or foolish, or shallow to know that the world can be a dreadful place. No. It’s for that very reason they’ve all made their choices. They’ve all been hurt. As have we all. But when wounded some people become embittered, cynical, sarcastic. They hurt back. But some, and I sometimes think they’re the ones most wounded, make another choice. They know nothing good comes of giving in to our darker instincts. And so they turn to what Lincoln in his Second Inaugural Address called, ‘The better angels of our nature.’ Three Pines is a place where kindness trumps cruelty, where people help each other, and care. Where sharing isn’t a word to be laughed at and even an embittered old poet is welcomed.”

DISCUSSION QUESTIONS:

  1. Louise Penny has said she modeled Armand Gamache on her husband. How do you picture Gamache?
  1. Other than Armand Gamache, who is your favorite character in the first half of the book? Why?
  1. People in this book have secrets, even Gamache. What secrets surprised you?
  1. What is your reaction to Agent Nichol’s behavior?
  1. Is it a flaw in Gamache that he has a desire to help people, and that he’s too compassionate?
  1. Ben Hadley tells Gamache the story of the three pines. Do you think the trees and village still serve a similar purpose for those who seek refuge?
  1. What happened to the Three Pines community as a result of Jane Neal’s death?
  1. Gamache has a fear of heights, and shows unexpected anger. He also refuses a direct order. Do these flaws make him more human, or indicate weakness?
  1. What did Clara mean by having “Surprised by Joy” engraved on Jane Neal’s tombstone?
  1. Louise Penny says this book is about choice. What did she mean by that?
  1. Three Pines is Louise Penny’s ideal village. What is your ideal village like?
  1. Penny uses poetry throughout the book. Is there one poem or line that resonates with you?

Still Life, Part 2

While Chief Inspector Gamache's team waits for the results of lab tests, he turns to the bookstore, and Myrna, for inspiration and answers. While they talk, he asks about the other woman who died recently, Timmer Hadley, and he realizes Myrna knows more than she's saying. So, he comes away from that conversation with more questions, and a book.that forces him to search for answers in a place that makes him confront another fear. He has to climb to the hunting blind, and he's afraid of heights. But, it's there he has a conversation with Clara that opens her eyes that someone local is a killer, and their feelings have been festering. As Gamache waits, he learns more about the villagers. Ruth Zardo is one of Canada's most famous poets. And, Clara and the villagers have a different view of the deceased Timmer Hadley than Myrna did. They've known Timmer longer, as Ben's mother, a hateful woman who terrorized her son.


READ FULL POST

Still Life, Part 1

I recently heard Louise Penny interviewed by her publisher, and, knowing Louise now, it came as a surprise to hear her say she identified with Agent Yvette Nichol. However, here's the final paragraph in the Acknowledgements in Still Life. "I went through a period in my life when I had no friends, when the phone never rang, when I thought I would die from loneliness. I know that the real blessing here isn't that I have a book published, but that I have so many people to thank." I never knew that lonely Louise. She herself is an example of the duality she writes about. I see her much more as Clara Morrow, and, she has said that as well. (Doesn't an author put herself into many characters?) Clara is a kind woman, who really wants to belong. I only know that Louise Penny, the warm, kind woman who reaches out to others.


READ FULL POST

737 replies on “Series Re-Read: Still Life”

Clara and Ruth are, for me, the most memorable and the ones I feel closest to as I read the stories. Clara is so quiet and self-contained over-shadowed by Peter and Ruth appears to be a crusty old harpy, but is the person who is able to observe the people around her.
Gamache, in my mind’s eye, is more like David Suchet or Michael Gambon. He is self-contained and try’s to get his team to look deeper into the “why” of the crimes he investigates.
Yvette gives me the feeling she is a ticking time bomb. She is trying to be everything to everyone and is completely out of her depth. And she is stubborn! Gamache’s advice is designed to bring out the best in all of his team but Jean-Guy is a man on a mission and he sees trouble in Yvette.
I found that I did not like Peter from the start. He is a character whom I feel I cannot trust.
The secrets are what make these books so interesting and drive most human interaction. We all have secrets that make us who we are, just like the characters in this series. Reine-Marie is the enigma for me in Gamache’s life and how he relates to his team.
Yvette seems to feel rejected and unsupported, not only by her family but by her team. Her reactions are her way of handling her own fears and a deterrent to her career. She seems unwilling or unable to stop herself, which is a sign of immaturity.
Three Pines is a place of solace and the description actually fits several places I knew when I was growing up. It is a touch-stone for those of us who need to feel enveloped in peace and security. It is the place we go to for comfort, especially when times are hard or tough. It is that comfortable place we all seek.

I wrote earlier that Peter Morrow is the one character I didn’t like, that he makes me feel uneasy. You put your finger on it though. I also feel he cannot be trusted. He is hiding his true self, even for his wife.

I don’t dislike Peter. I think perhaps he is one of the most human of all the characters. I think He’s confused and hurting inside. Wanting to help. Wanting to do what is right. Like the scene where he’s trying to choose which tea is appropriate and he settles on Earl Grey. He knows choices are important but doesn’t quite understand how to go about making them. He thinks choices should be easy, just pick out what’s perfect. Perfect tea, perfect actions, perfect art. He’s certain he’s made good choices and can’t quite understand why others are more successful.

I ache for Peter. I know so many like him. Sometimes I feel like him. He could have quite a nice journey if only he could (but he will never) understand he was most perfect with cake on his face.

Peter has the ability to drive anyone crazy. His art is meticulous, too perfect. I feel that he is wound up like a top but he is not able or will not allow himself to be a free spirit. He scares me and I feel like he will harm Clara, even as he proclaims his love for her.
I have the feeling that if I were to look at the art of Peter, I would find a typical landscape from the early eighteenth century whereas, looking at Clara’s paintings would be full of light and life, like Clara.
Myrna is the other enigma — I love her sense of place. I want to understand why she left a career to open a used book store in a hamlet.

Peters art is described as quite wonderful. He creates it by carefully looking at objects through a microscope, meticulously painting what he sees through the scope.

Clara paints what she sees with her heart. Therein lies all the difference.

I think Peter and Myrna mirror each other. Peter presents as being concerned with appearance and precision. He tries to have a good heart, but really he has little internal substance. Myrna is just the opposite; her exterior is large, colorful and almost messy, while her interior is rock solid. When Peter says something you wonder where it came from, what he means and what’s being left unsaid. When Myrna says something, you know it resonates with her core and it’s presented in a way that it also resonates with the listener.

I like this analysis of Peter. It leaves room to look at him charitably. He does love Clara and tries to be tender. (Remember he holds her all night trying to comfort her. He also tried to protect Ben when they were children.)

Someone comments that Nichol wasn’t brought up the same way as perhaps Gamaches children. That’s true of Peter as well. He does feel and want to display love but his parents were more concerned and taught him more about being proper. A boys school would have pounded into him the need for self preservation and not too much about tenderness and affection.

You-all have nudged me into waaay kinder ways of looking at Nichol. I must confess that in my preliminary readings of this series, I settled with simply dismissing her & being annoyed. You’ve helped me round out her picture. I felt sad at Jane’s death–she’s as vibrant as the rest of the characters that open up to us in Still Life. Ruth is all elbows and harrumphing, with a cackle and wise, observing eye: I can see through her bluster right away and am drawn to her.

And, that’s one reason for the discussion, to make us take a second look at the characters, and the series, and see them through others’ eyes. That’s why I love a good book discussion. So much comes up that I didn’t think about when I read the book. Other people have ideas and insights that I don’t have.

Just re-finished this book and as a writer I was struck with the fullness of all the characters – the strengths and the weaknesses of the players we might want to think of as all-hero or all-villain. So Agent Nicholl and Gamache are not polar opposites, but rather humans shaped and misshaped on journeys to what is hopefully a greater understanding. Especially wonderful is the insight that our weaknesses don’t have to be totally eradicated but must be given a short acknowledgement and then dismissed as no longer in charge of our actions. I hope to be able to both live and write this as my next decade unfolds.

READING GUIDE Item #6. “Consider Gamache’s advice to Nichol: “Life is choice. All day, everyday. Who we talk to, where we sit, what we say, how we say it. And our lives become defined by our choices. It’s as simple and as complex as that. And as powerful.” Similarly, Myrna stopped practicing psychology because she lost patience with people who lead “still” lives, “waiting for someone to save them….The fault lies with us, and only us. It’s not fate, not genetics, not bad luck, and it’s definitely not Mom and Dad. Ultimately it’s us and our choices.” How do their choices affect the principal characters in the novel? Do any of their choices remind you of ones you have made in your own life?”

When we begin Still Life, we jump into the lives of characters who have all made significant choices that find them involved in one way or another in this story. Gamache immediately makes me think of some of the words by another favorite character of mine: “It is our choices…that show what we truly are, far more than our abilities.” and “Dark times lie ahead of us and there will be a time when we must choose between what is easy and what is right.”

K.E., you have hit upon the part of Still Life which resonates the most for me. Agent Nicol, like Ben Hadley, is waiting for something to happen; someone to fix everything and tell them, “You are right – everyone else is wrong. You are under-appreciated”. Ben (what a tortured, twisted soul!) wants the money, the house and the power over others he thinks that will bring him. Yvette ….. well, she is difficult to figure… but in many ways I think she is sitting still, waiting for the accolades to come in, but not wanting to work very hard to earn them.

So many of us (me, too) spend time having a still life, waiting for something.

Myrna’s comments in that same discussion with Gamache about having to lose something to grow is also very powerful. “Life is loss”.

I also think there is a sense of “Still, Life” in the title in reference to Jane. She may have been stilled by a murderer, but there is ‘still life’ in her art and ‘still life’ in her vision that continues to penetrate her world and change it and bring about righteousness after her body has departed. There’s are many readings for that title!

Penny, I so appreciated your comment on Still Life as a multifaceted evocation. The village, the painters, the poet, the death. Why I stand transfixed by a still life in a museum … why I am drawn back to reading about Three Pines. As a village it acts as a microcosm for observation, as does a still life, as does a murder. I even more appreciate the brilliant choice as the title to the novel and the beginning of the series.

I read Nicol as someone afflicted with a real limitation that time and experience have no way to heal. She seems like someone who is not able to read facial clues or to reflect in a meaningful way on the words people say to her (thus she writes down “I forget” with no sense that it does not belong on such a list – and has no way to read Gamache’s tone of voice to distinguish it from his earlier three phrases of wisdom. It’s just not the case that all can grow – some are limited as surely by their mental state – illness or syndrome – as if they had a more obvious physical limitation. Figuring out how to deal with people like that is the tricky and necessary thing – and Gamache has as much trouble deciding on a good course of action as the rest of us.

It’s odd how everyone is so charitable with Nichol. She reminds me of a person a friend described to me. My friend was tasked with developing some classes to be taught to church women’s organization. She held a meeting and invited a few women from different age groups to ask what subjects or topics they felt they or others might find interesting or would like to explore.

One of the more mature women raised her hand and proclaimed, “I can’t believe you actually think there is anything you can teach me.”

Nichol does want to fit in. She seems to believe changing her clothes or mimicking what others are saying will do the trick. However, she truly believes she’s so brilliant that there’s little to learn from even Gamache. She’s very smug about picking up on clues others have missed. That made her smarter than all the others, right?

All the characters at this point seem to have made choices, like Gamache, that have brought them to this place at this point in time. We are able to see clearly the choices Nichol is making as she begins this assignment with Gamache and his team. I want to grab her by the shoulders at this point and shake some sense into her. Her choices are all wrong and so frustrating to watch.

It would be helpful if EVERYONE answered the book club questions! I have read the entire series but would like us to focus on each book as they are discussed. The review of and discussion of the questions relating to this book are pertinent to this book and nothing else at this juncture!! I would ask that everyone refrain from any discussion that is not pertinent to this particular book! Thank you.

I agree, Bonnie. Yes we have all read and retread them and love them, but if this is going to work, we have to hold our horses and GO BACK TO THE TEXT. We can wander and ponder, but what does the text say to support those meanderings? Peevishly, Pen.

I first read Still Life on Sept 26, 2013 – a recommendation from one of the clerks at The Gallery Bookstore in Mendocino, CA. My husband & I make an annual trip every year to this wonderful village where we were married…and always several trips to the bookstore. I took that book back to our B&B and as I turned off the light to sleep that night(reluctantly) I told me husband we must go back to the bookstore & get all of Louis Penny’s books they have in stock! And we did. When we returned home I ordered all the rest them on line. I finished them all in January 2014 and have been excitedly awaiting the next one. Three Pines reminds me a little of Mendocino, which too is a small village. The way each mystery unfolds allows us to feel a part of the investigation and draws us in to the way Inspector Gamache devels into each person’s mind. Ruth Zardo is one of my favorites because I know deep inside there is a heart of mush.
I think Gamache’s compassion is a strong point that builds his team and holds them together. He takes each person for their best points & uses those to their best advantage.

Just a general comment to start…. I have tried some of the authors that Louise likes herself, and I must say that she far surpasses ALL of them in literary style and gift of story-telling. I know it’s impossible but I wish she could write a new book every month! And having read all the books, I love how Gamache loves the unlovable, those hardest to love (who are the ones who need it most, right?).

I just reread “Still Life” after having read all the books. Agent Nichol is puzzling to me. I actually think she needs a bit more depth. Why can’t she open up a bit more? In the beginning she is clearly trying to get Gamache’s favor, but then it stops.
She reminds me a bit of my 11-year-old, who doesn’t like to be told what to do by her mother.
I’m going to teach her the four pillars, though!

I agree-Nichol is puzzling. I want to know more about where her contempt for the others comes from. She wants to please-to a point. She wants to be acknowledged-to a point. When she gets what she wants, it doesn’t meet her expectations, and instead of being able to see it for what it is, the lesson of the moment is dismissed out of hand. Where does that come from? Intriguing.

All the characters in their own way deeply stirred me. I felt for Yvette Nichol, because like Ms. Penny, I too have had times of feeling lonely and lost and wanting to please everyone. I think Ruth Zardo is my favorite character so far. She gives the impression of not being quite there and at times comes across as almost abusive. But Ruth doesn’t miss a thing and what’s more I think Gamache is very aware of this. Others might dismiss Ruth as a harmless eccentric old lady but her poetry says otherwise.

This quote reminds me of the Yvette Nichol character and also the journey to and the place where you hit rock bottom: “Perhaps everything terrible is, in its deepest being, something helpless that wants help from us. ~Rainer Maria Rilke

Everyone of my friends who are Gamache fans are a little in love with him. I’ve always pictures him as David Suchet, not in his Poirot personna, but with that sense of gravitas and class he carries.

I adore Ruth Zardo and Clara and so many of Louise’s wonderful creations, but am secretly envious of Reine-Marie Annie and hope we will come to know the women of the Gamache family better in future novels.

I feel envious of Reine-Marie as well! A very lucky lady to spend her life with such a thoughtful, compassionate man.

I have always loved the character of Reine-Marie. You can feel their love in every description of the two of them. She shares his life, but has also had to live the ups and downs of his career: like the pain when the murder investigations come home with him, and the current uncertainty of the “stalled career.” I love the humour in how she has to justify his absence at the family gatherings that he misses — the drinking, the treatment centre, etc. — and being “a martyr to my husband.” She could be bitter and resentful, but is his strength, so that he can continue doing what he does best.

In the airport in Charlotte and late to the party. Just started rereading Still Life for the third time a few hours ago. Louise your first book is indeed a “still life, ” and like any work of art it exhibits a new aspect of beauty and mystery with each encounter.

I only literally and literarily met Louise Penny a month ago at the Calamari Crime Left Coast convention. I was lucky enough to receive the book “Still Life” as a gift in my tote bag. A close friend of hers introduced us so I found myself reading the book in a day and hungry for more.
To me, the most compelling part of Ganache’s character is the four pillars of wisdom he tries to impart to Agent Nichol
I don’t know
I’m sorry
I was wrong
I need help
Last week I was lecturing new nurses about how to triage skin diseases. After the title slide I quoted these 4 statements as I thought it was important that not only in the lecture but in their careers the new nurses not be afraid to say them to patients and peers. Imagine my surprise when the nurse mentor, who invited me to speak, roared “Stop!” and proceeded to tell the new graduates that this was the most important lesson they would learn from any speaker.
Thank you Louise Penny, speaking through Armand Ganache, who reminds me of many of my medical school professors, male and female, and for Agent Nichol. who reminds me of so many I’ve met along the way.

If I could cross stitch, these four lines would be framed in my library. Its the true heart of Gamache revealed and laid bare.

Susan, What a beautiful story. Thank you for sharing it. Those sentences meant so much to me. It’s wonderful to know you carried them through in a setting where compassion is so essential.

I do know how to spell Gamache, I just got it confused with panache! Thanks so much for your introductory notes and your moderation of this forum! looking forward to reading your website.

Susan, isn’t that a terrific story. I loved that the senior staff person recognized its elegance.

Thanks so much for responding. Sometimes in the medical profession to say I don’t know is perceived by others as a weakness. In fact it is a great strength to say it, adding, can anyone help? or I’ll find out!

Susan, I think your story illustrates so well just how important Louise Penny’s writing is! Her words don’t just tell a great story, they are a guide to life lived well, with compassion and intelligence.

In going back and reading (again, probably for at least the 3d time) Still Life, I was struck by the image of Jane ‘last seen’ leaving the Thanksgiving party into the dark with her flashlight ‘like Diogenes’ (in mythology, he went about eternally with a lamp looking for one truly good man). This clue to her character is also a clue to her murder. She is intently looking about her world, and seeing more than others see.
Gamache is a particularly wonderful character who reminds me of men of my father’s generation (my Dad would have been 100 this year). Gentlemanliness and manliness go hand in hand with them, they take care in their dress, show firmness in leadership, and compassion under all. They have humility (the four questions) and they are truly interested in others. One looks like Diogenes for such men. They’re out there, but they’re rare.
Yvette Nichol is one of the most interesting characters I’ve encountered in contemporary fiction. She seems unlikeable, self-destructive, endlessly, misguidedly arrogant.. She clearly grew to adulthood in a family that gave her none of the guidance available to, say, the Gamache children. Competitiveness without a point–that seems to be her driving force. She’s very interesting indeed, and keeps me interested all through the series.

More about that ‘Diogenes’ moment–you will notice that in Gamache, Jane finds a truly good man, even though she has left this life by the time he turns up. Louise Penny makes much of them looking into each others’ eyes. It is as if her virtue and search for virtue has attracted not only her murderer but the one good man who is able to resolve the issue of her death.

Susan, how powerful that you used these Four Pillars in a lecture for health care providers. I sent these very words in a letter to my son last fall after he left home for college. My window of daily influence on his life may have closed but the wisdom of Gamache resonates at any age!

Susan,
Kudos on bringing this into your lecture!! As a now-retired nurse, faculty, ethics committee member, I can relate to your connection with these statements. I believe that healthcare is beginning to “get it”, but we are a long way from truly encompassing this as a practice and how wonderful that you were able to share this with your students.

Thank you for reminding me of the four attributes that Gamache relates to Yvette. I wish that had been written in stone for all the students to memorize. The words are profound in most situations in life!

I am a nurse educator. Those four statements are posted on my office wall. They apply to all of us, no matter what we do!

You know, it’s funny, but the first time I read Gamache’s four guidelines, “I don’t know, …am sorry…was wrong…need help.” I sort of just slipped over them — as – duh! Don’t we all know this? Then I thought about it and realized that I and probably many parents have utilized these also unconsciously. Will never forget the first time I admitted to one of my classes that I hadn’t the foggiest idea of how to answer some question and the stares of disbelief! Or – when I admitted that I am not a writer who produces perfectly composed & finished pieces on a first draft. I’m messy & rapidly download ideas initially to figure out just what I wanted to say. In the first case – a ‘search for the answer” turned into an extra credit 25 points for the first five who supplied the answer to the question. The second – using my own drafting, revisions, peer responses – from the kids – were models for them to invest more in their own major assignment written work. Ironically, we seem to learn more from those four statements (and I from my students!) than we teach at times. Sorry for the aside, just made a little connection!

I also love those four sentences and the wisdom they hold. And I loved the part where Nichol initially thinks the fourth sentence is “I forget, ” and then proceeds to use them all inappropriately.

I wonder if it occurred to anyone else that Agent Nichol might have Asperger’s Syndrome, The very literal interpretations and obliviousness to context would be consistent with that. I’m also thinking here of the scene where Nichol is in Ruth’s bathroom and sees the mirror with the sticker that says “You’re looking at the problem,” and immediately examines the shower, the soap, the bath mat… and later in the book, applies the same phrase to Gamache’s reflection.

I was stunned on reading Still Life, by its gorgeous use of language, of Louise’s subtle and effective set up of the mis en scene, and in realizing that beyond anything else, the book was a love story between author and Gamache. It drew me in forever. If I ever have to say goodbye to Gamache, I will weep with grief!

Ganache holds the story together makes you feel secure and totally honourable. Without him there is no story – love his approach to life and people.

Jean Reno, now 65, is one of my favorite French actors. Actually, he might be perfect and he does remind me a bit of Michael, whom I’ve been fortunate enough to meet.

Myrna is my favorite character. She’s comfortable in herself and seems very connected to the universe.

Yes, I think Jean Reno could definitely play the part. Gamache represents what is essentially French in the culture of Quebec. He has great style, great heart and great intellect.

On another note, I wonder who people would select to play Clara.

I don’t know if it’s a flaw in Gamache’s character that he has a desire to help people, or that he’s too compassionate. I do find it fascinating, and reflective of real life, that other people to whom Gamache has extended this same compassion can’t understand it when he offers it to others (whom they consider, perhaps, unworthy).

I think his compassion is definitely his strength. In fact, his ability to continually reach out to others and have faith in their ability to do the right thing when he has chosen a career which constantly exposes him to the darkest part of a man’s soul may be his greatest strength. He believes especially in his staff – that they can reach their potential and trusts them with his life and the lives of others in times of crisis. He is not afraid of others’ weaknesses and maybe most importantly he is aware of and not afraid of his own weaknesses. Perhaps he was lead to Three Pines at the start of this series at a point when he could have given in to cynicism and disillusionment with the Surete. Three Pines offered him at first an escape from the corruption in the police force and then it strengthened his resolve to maintain his moral compass even when it stalled his career and placed those he loved in danger.

I like Gamache the best. He picks the most unlikely people to be part of his homicide team. He sees the diamond in the rough. The diamond has to earn the polish though.
Gamache is always my favorite but I love all the folks in Three Pines.

Of course everyone loves Gamache. You feel so protected by his calm exterior, even though we know he is often conflicted if not to say tortured inside. I think Reine Marie, his wife is very lucky to accompany this man throughout life, but pays a big price personally in doing so. I think the fact that Gamache wants to relate everything happening to her shows us the unbreakable bond the two of them have together.

When I am reading I picture Gamache as someone with rugged handsome looks – piercing eyes that see not only what is apparent, but also what is between the lines. Like Louise I picture my husband and/or someone like Pierce Brosnan or Michael Kitchen …. Makes me laugh to actually write that down…

I’ve always pictured Tom Selleck as Gamache. He has that sense of calm and compassion in his brown eyes, and he fits the body type that Penny describes.

I see Tom Selleck with a Quebecois accent as Gamache. Not the Magnum PI Tom Selleck, but more like the Jessie Stone Selleck. Quiet, fair, a seeker of justice.

I agree that Tom Selleck would be a good choice, however I am not sure that I would ever see any filmed version of these books. Too often I have seen excellent books turned into messy confusions. I prefer to see all of these characters as I have seen them in my mind’s eye.

I had not thought of Michael Kitchen but now that you mention it, he is more who I see in my mind’s eye. Foyle does play an officer with many of the same characteristics as Gamache, except with an English accent!

Wow – all this talk of Michael Kitchen as Gamache has given me a new series to watch as I wait for part 2 of Still Life.

Having read all the books in the series, I recently introduced Still Life to my book club in hopes that they will continue on and read the rest of the series. One of the comments was “Will Agent Nichole be in the rest of the books, I hope not”. There is not much to like about her in Still Life, but as with the rest of the cast, her character evolves into a much needed thread in the web that Louise is stringing.

I wonder how much of the entire series Louise foresaw as she was writing STILL LIFE. It would be so interesting if she could give us some insight into how far the characters were already developed in her mind or did she let them grow as she wrote each book. I can’t imagine, for instance, that she doesn’t have some idea of what will happen with Yvette Nichol, and whether she’ll remain in future books or be cast aside.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

The owner of this website has made a commitment to accessibility and inclusion, please report any problems that you encounter using the contact form on this website. This site uses the WP ADA Compliance Check plugin to enhance accessibility.